Search

Michael B. Duignan – the Olympic Researcher

Mike's research and teaching blog | @michaelbduignan | Michael.Duignan@anglia.ac.uk

Month

August 2013

My first works to be published – a review of ‘Events and Urban Regeneration’ book for Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure & Events

Full PDF version here:  Final version – Events and Urban Regeneration- the Strategic use of Events to Revitalise Cities (Book Review)

BOOK REVIEW – ‘Events and Urban Regeneration: the Strategic Use of Events to Revitalise Cities’, by Andrew Smith, London, UK, Routledge, , 2012, xv+302pp., £24.99 (paperback) , ISBN 978-0-415-58148-6

By Michael B Duignan
Journal of  Policy Research, Tourism, Leisure and Events (to be published – Nov, 2013 or March 2014 edition)

          From the evolutionary changes seen in city event strategies, to the anticipated direction of post-industrial cites and the role of infrastructure and appropriate urban development strategies, Smith covers a complex series of relevant topics, inviting the reader tEvents and Urban Regeneration - book covero understand how urban regeneration is delivered within major event contexts. Starting with a comprehensive theoretical platform of economic, political and social perspectives, Smith delves deeper in to the practical side of delivering such projects. He explores the catalytic properties of events for fuelling new urban projects, and their extraordinary nature to fast track existing priorities commenting on their power to influence wider city development and regeneration. Later on in Chapter 9, Smith provides a useful insight in to how such events are project managed. He analyses particular aspects of urban governance, exposing the often competing, conflicting nature of decisions made at a project management level, and the difficulties this poses for those delivering event regeneration. Balancing the needs of multiple stakeholder groups (e.g. local stakeholders, private and public organisations) in order to execute a ‘successful event’, and as of recent years delivering longer-term ‘legacy’ outputs, clearly appears to be a tough feat according to Smith’s analysis.

          A critical synthesis of key literatures, in-depth international case studies, visual aids and pockets of primary sources of data are used to justify arguments and provide recommendations for future urban policy and practice. One of the key strengths of the book is the match between detailed analysis of topics and the ‘global approach’ to major event analysis that allows Smith to provide a well-informed, qualitatively robust account of causalities between event policies and subsequent impacts for cities. Complete with a series of in-text, and end-of-chapter extended case studies, this is where the book comes in to its own. At the time of writing, there is no other book that has achieved such depth. Smith’s methodical approach to the writing and structuring of this book provides an exemplary learning experience. Concepts are clearly defined, applied to practice, balanced with some critical theory and illustrated within case study perspectives, providing the authority for judgements made. Throughout, Smith provides a series of well-balanced arguments presenting both favourable and critical opinions. There are however some specific noteworthy criticisms that emerge as core themes throughout his writing.

          With regards to such critical perspectives, it is the experiences of local community stakeholders in particular that resonate throughout the author’s work. Although not explicitly, Smith explores the notion of local casualties – often a product of a neo-liberal regime of privatisation and commercialisation etc, suggesting that urban city environments operate within a bourgeois playground for the elites, at the expense of community disadvantage. Obviously elites are not quite the declared beneficiaries of major events and subsequent economic development if we were to look at event-bid rhetoric, but as Smith explores, this is often the potential futures for a gentrified urban landscape. This is a common observation within major event settings, but is gentrification for good or bad? Who exactly receives a slice of the Olympic pie? Smith for example highlights the importance of estate price rises, for more property-led event funding to combat spiralling (often public) spending; however short-term impacts can often lead to the displacement of local communities and economically vulnerable groups (residential and business). These are the (many) types of contradictions that Smith explores (pages 256 – 259). Throughout the book, the author explores such controversies associated with hosting events, particularly ‘global vs local’ (and macro Vs micro) perspectives, ideologies that continue to spark commentator scepticism- even as we move in to an epoch supposedly characterised by ‘softer’ social and ‘people-focused’ regeneration (and longer-term legacy outcomes), rather than one characterised by the ‘harder’, economic (cost-benefit) based ambitions. Despite such rhetoric, contemporary authors continue to introduce the critical metaphor of Bakhtin’s ‘carnival mask’ to theoretically explore events as a sinister phenomenon of superficial regeneration (Harvey, 1989), that provides a ‘smokescreen’ (page 32) for inherent urban problems, rather than directly tackling them. As Smith and many authors critically postulate, such ‘softer’ outcomes desired by event organisers for particular communities, may just be a fig leaf to justify major expenditures, as cities realise the impossibility of economic returns on investment.

          Smith explores how the pressure of globalisation, and increasing severity of city competition for inward investment may be the focus for cities in the 21st century- a catalyst used to market and promote a city to attract e.g inward investment, a shift from ‘managerialism’ to ‘entrepreneurialism’ (Harvey, 1989) and a focus on the ‘entrepreneurial city’. Does this symbolise a shift towards a late / post-modernist paradigm? Smith argues again the contextual nature of this debate, exploring how South Africa, for example, are still seeking major events as a modernisation project to stimulate industrialisation, whereas Western societies and more developed (post-industrial) nations can be seen as entering a period of late / post-modernity. Smith however concludes that major events continue to be seen through a modern lens for progressive means, with postmodern tendencies in specific instances.

          Early on in Smith’s work (chapter 2), readers are treated with a much-needed theoretical platform to understand event regeneration at a deeper level, helping to explore why event projects are pursued, who they are meant to benefit and why they may / may not work, the complex processes that deliver them and explain why sceptics exist. Such theoretical, critical perspectives provide a much required injection to 1) a book that is very practice focussed, and 2) a field of inquiry systematically lacking in theoretical underpinning. Pages eighteen to forty in particular move away from the ‘nitty gritty’ of project complexity, to explore more sociological, cultural, political and economic dimensions of event delivery. Although a much needed theoretical dose, the author could have more closely bridged what appears to be a significant gap between theoretical explanations and practical considerations throughout. Instead, theoretical perspectives remained relatively divorced and fragmented from case studies and the analysis of practice, where I was left at times thinking e.g. “is Smith trying to reflect a view of neo-liberalism here?”… “Are these policies of state control, consolidating Smith’s critical ‘Ventilsitten ‘steam valve’ theory”? Even if Smith meant for such theoretical criticisms to be implicit in practice provided, I believe a more direct application would have provided a clearer heuristic.

          Smith’s work is genuinely a must have for those examining the relationship between events and urban regeneration and/or interested in the ecology of cities amidst a complex storm of ambitious political, commercial, economic and social event-related policies. Within known historical and contemporary urban arenas of contextual complexity, contradictions and competing stakeholder interests, the level of detail presented by the author throughout, provides an exceptional level of analysis – a must-read for students and practitioners alike.

Note: a huge thanks to both my supervisor Dr Ilaria Pappalepore, author Dr Andrew Smith of the University of Westminster and JPRiTLE for providing me with the opportunity to review such an interesting and thought provoking book.

Come back soon for the official published version from the journal.

What’s your writing style? Do you worship words from Anglo-Saxon, or do you favor French forms? An interesting history and disection of both styles…

Anglo SaxonMouth_Talk_SpeechBubble

When it comes to writing, are you the Anglo-Saxon type, or do you go for French flair? You probably realize that Modern English derives from a wide variety of sources, and perhaps are aware that words derived from French are just as common in our language as those that are descended directly from Old English, otherwise known as Anglo-Saxon.

But did you know that one of the features of English that make it such a rich language is a prevalence, unusual among the world’s languages, of synonyms, thanks to the fact that we have retained words from both Anglo-Saxon and French (and often other languages) that have the same meaning?

And have you considered that whether you choose a word derived from Anglo-Saxon or one borrowed from French or one of its Latinate relatives has a significant bearing on your writing voice?

Thanks to the Norman Conquest, for example, the Anglo-Saxon language became a second-class (or lower-class) tongue in England, supplanted in political and social contexts by Norman French, and therefore many cognates reflect the differences in relations to things between the two classes (who though their languages differed were closely related ethnically).

For example, Anglo-Saxon words for animals raised for food often reflect the role of Anglo-Saxons as keepers of livestock (cow, calf, sheep, pig), whereas the words obtained from French describe the food itself as it appeared on the table after cultivation and preparation by Anglo-Saxon farmers and servants (beef, veal, mutton, pork).

By the same token, many Anglo-Saxon words seem, by comparison with French, more plainspoken — more earthy (or earthly, rather than terrestrial, just as Anglo-Saxon heaven is more basic than the French-based equivalent, celestial). Other cognates that point out the differing perspectives are pairs like the humble home and the magnificent mansion, though often, for every master (French) there is a lord (Anglo-Saxon).

Of course, Anglo-Saxon acquired many words from Latin and its descendants before the Conquest, such as the introduction of many religious terms during the spread of Christianity and the expansion of the language due to trade with other European countries.

Likewise, the Germanic tribes that coalesced into the people of Anglo-Saxon England adopted many Latin and Greek terms before their arrival in Britain. And even after the largely Norman aristocracy abandoned their form of French in favor of Middle English, the latter language acquired many words from the influence of the Renaissance, and early Modern English was likewise enriched by the Enlightenment.

Notice, in your writing, whether you have an affinity with Anglo-Saxon or a French fetish, or whether you are bilingual: Do you give, or present? Do you describe someone as misleading, or deceptive? Do you refer to fatherly, motherly, or brotherly bonds or affection, or paternal, maternal, or fraternal feelings?

Though the number of English words derived from each language is about the same, the ones most essential for basic communication are of Anglo-Saxon origin, and many people correlate heavy use of Latin-derived words with verbosity and overblown language.

Thanks to M Nichol at DWT for writing this!
Original here: http://www.dailywritingtips.com/word-origin-influences-your-writing-voice/

Thanks Harvard! Need to read research critically? – some simple tips extracted from current research

6 important aspects of reading research critically – amalgamated from Harvard, Cambridge and Anglia Ruskin resources!

Reading academic text critically (2013)

My research (as at May, 2013) – it may have changed a tad since…

Close to your viva? See Park’s (2003) ‘Best Practice in the Viva’ paper!

Levelling the Playing Field – Towards Best Practice in the Doctoral Viva (Park, 2003)

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑