Search

Michael B. Duignan – the Olympic Researcher

Mike's research and teaching blog | @michaelbduignan | Michael.Duignan@anglia.ac.uk

Category

University teaching resources

‘No beards necessary’! …Doing research and the life of a PhD

Doing Research and the Life of a PhD (2014)

Prezi available here:
http://prezi.com/9tk-zhnv6kxe/?utm_campaign=share&utm_medium=copy&rc=ex0share

About: amid stereotypes, preconceptions of the ‘normal’ PhD type (see Bart and The Simpson’s clip!), this Prezi delves in to what it is really like to be a ‘social scientist’ and alternative-non-dumbledore-esque young researcher. I explore what my research is all about, why I chose the academic route, the opportunities, the challenges and the characteristic required to start your early academic career off to a good start.

Advertisements

‘Becoming a Digital Scholar’ – 2014 programme launch!

25 January, 2014 – Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford Campus

'Becoming a Digital Scholar' (2014)

View the ‘Becoming a Digital Scholar’ programme Prezi here: http://bit.ly/1f1sdvR 

Introduction to the programme (1  ½ hour) – Michael Duignan

Kicking off the ‘Becoming a Digital Scholar’ programme, for the first 60 minutes – we delve in to the nitty gritty of ‘why’. Why should the 21st Century PhD student, early-career or fully fledging academic even consider using digital tools and social media within their academic agenda. We explored how digital technology, is catalysing revolutionary changes in a wide range of industries – specifically including education, higher education and research, and what it means to be a truly open, networked and digital 21st century researcher (Weller, 2012). Opportunities, challenges are presented in ‘becoming digital’, alongside an exploration as to the types of social technology freely available to researchers – and in depth look as to how these opportunities can complement the more conventional, traditional routes of scholarly knowledge dissemination.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

Workshop 1 – ‘Power of the blog’ (approx 1 ½ hours) – Michael Duignan

Blog’s have become in recent years one of the key tools of the digital academic (see Weller, 2012). Often as a source of research dissemination, space for teaching resources and as a tool for general reflection, blogs can provide a complete digital solution, where academic peers and public can gain a snapshot in to your academic profile, previous, current and future research activity. The workshop will run for approximately 1 ½ hours, and will introduce academics to the practicalities of the tool, functionality and will help you develop your own blog to take away by the end of the session.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

Workshop 2 – “From pie charts to infographics. And back.” (approx 1 ½ hours) – Ricardo Carolas

The session aims at allowing participants to critically evaluate the way academic data may be presented.
We will start by looking at the work on visual communication pioneered by Otto Neurath (1936) and will try to understand how and when visualisation techniques may be appropriate to present academic data.
Scott Berinato (2013) has recently suggested that data visualisation should turn from being pretty to becoming pretty effective. Taking this notion on board, and by making use of a free online visualisation tool, participants will be made aware of the importance to conceptualising data into visual elements and how to turn pie charts into better visualisation tools.

Interested in joining the next ‘Becoming a Digital Scholar’ 2014 workshop? – email: Michael.Duignan@anglia.ac.uk

Thanks, Mike

British Library event – Doctoral Open Day: Digital Research (17 Jan, 2014)

Digital Research imageShare×

When: Fri 17 Jan 2014, 10.00 – 16.30

Where: Conference Centre, British Library

Price: £5

Book now for 17 Jan 2014

Over the last two decades the British Library has become a vast resource not only of physical objects, but of digital items. These data range from digitised text, sound, visual, and philatelic material, to born-digital collections of personal archives and web content. These data are transforming research, with new tools and computational techniques generating new discoveries and new understanding in the arts, humanities, and social sciences.

This event is a chance for PhD students to explore digital research methods and how they might be applied to the British Library’s digital collections. It’s a chance to experiment, learn about interesting research projects, and discuss the ways that using digital sources might affect your research. You’ll meet our expert staff and network with other researchers from across the UK.

The event is aimed at first year PhD students, or doctoral students who are new to digital research. Lunch and refreshments are included.

To make the most of your day, you may wish to get a free Reader Pass before the event.

A small number of £20 travel bursaries are available for students coming from outside Greater London. Email us to apply

Draft programme for the Digital Research Doctoral Open Day

Digital Scholarship 2014 – 10 simple social media tips in 10 winter’y weeks!

Digital Scholarship 2014 – 10 simple social media tips in 10 winter’y weeks!

Early this year (Jan – Feb 2014) I am going to plough plenty of energy  towards writing a number of short blogs aimed at developing digital literacy for PhD’s right through to senior academics. The idea is to create 10 very informal tips, every week on a specific theme that can be easily digested into the life of any academic – that will run alongside my ‘Becoming a Digital Scholar’ programme of physical workshops at Anglia Ruskin University in 2014.

social_networkGraph

Yep, you may be thinking, its not really my cup of tea. I haven’t got time. Academia does not need these non-traditional routes (e.g. Twitter, blogs, Flicker). But although the traditional routes of academia will not disappear anytime soon, the real-time opportunity to disseminate all the cool things are you research (and develop yourself as a global scholar) is becoming revolutionised by the advent of social and digital tools…!

Here is a snapshot of things i’ll be covering…

  • How ‘digital technology’ is changing the field of global academic scholarship
  • The complex options for being ‘social’
  • The power of the blog
  • Blurring the lines between personal and profession social networking – do’s and dont’s
  • Connecting your research data via ‘infographics’
  • Developing your online academic profile – tips and tools for networking!

The first one starts next Monday (13th Jan, 2014) and will be run for 10 winter’y weeks to get your digital literacy up to the top of the class!

Follow my blog for automatic updates, or just keep checking back here!! Hope to have you along…!

See you soon!
Mike – the Olympic Researcher

Seems like there is just an infinite of choices for ‘social networking’?

Baffled with all the many ‘social’ + ‘digital’ mechanisms out there for networking? You’ll probably be able to relate to this video!

British Academy of Management (BAM) Doctoral Symposium (9 Sept 2013)

On the 9 September, my colleague Irina and I ventured up to the dizzy heights of Liverpool to take part in BAM’s doctoral symposium – an event for networking with other business PhD’s and researcher training (how to develop convincing arguments, coherance of methodology etc). I am however not going to ramble on and talk about what we got up to – that would just be boring (apart from the fact at midnight we were glugging red wine with THE Saunders (et al!) 2000 and something (yes the guy who created the research onion!!!).

In essence the blog is purely to share my notes and insights from the day – so see both attachments below…

Prof David Deyner Slides – Conducting a Literature Review (BAM 2013) – OFFICIAL SLIDES FROM PROF DENYER (CRANFIELD)

BAM Conference (2013) – MY INTEPRETATION OF HIS SLIDES, INCLUDING NOTES ON ‘HOW TO DEVELOP A CONVINCING ARGUMENT IN YOUR PHD’

If anything doesnt make sense in the notes, or you want to talk through any parts – email me: Michael.Duignan@anglia.ac.uk

Mike and Irina - BAM

Cambridge Festival of Ideas talk – ‘Impact of mega-events and local festivals on local businesses’ (7-9pm, 23 Oct) – Room LAB006

FoI promo for blog

Talk outline

The London 2012 Games project has passed for those organising and delivering its logistics. However, stories of impact and potential ‘Olympic Legacy’ for local communities and traders are starting to unfold. Will the utopian futures of ‘Olympic Legacy’ hold true for local business?

This talk will explore the potential ways such mega-event and local festival projects (from London 2012 to EAT Cambridge 2013) can impact on local businesses, highlight the potential opportunities and uncertainties that entrepreneurs can face, and discuss some of the key arguments and dichotomies that exist within event delivery. We draw up on previous case study examples and data collected from London 2012 as a foundation for debate.

Guest speakers

I am pleased to announce an excellent selection of speakers – a blend of expert and local knowledge:

Dr Ilaria Pappalepore (Senior Lecturer in Tourism, Anglia Ruskin) – touching on how local creative industries can be impacted by mega-events

Lorraine Turton (Chair, East Greenwich Business Association) – providing experience of Greenwich’s local business community impacts pre, during and post-Games

Ceri Littlechild (Mill Road Coordinator, Cambridge City Council) – responsible as a liaison between council and community, Ceri will be providing anecdotal experience from local traders as to the economic and social impacts of events on Mill Road traders.

My first works to be published – a review of ‘Events and Urban Regeneration’ book for Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure & Events

Full PDF version here:  Final version – Events and Urban Regeneration- the Strategic use of Events to Revitalise Cities (Book Review)

BOOK REVIEW – ‘Events and Urban Regeneration: the Strategic Use of Events to Revitalise Cities’, by Andrew Smith, London, UK, Routledge, , 2012, xv+302pp., £24.99 (paperback) , ISBN 978-0-415-58148-6

By Michael B Duignan
Journal of  Policy Research, Tourism, Leisure and Events (to be published – Nov, 2013 or March 2014 edition)

          From the evolutionary changes seen in city event strategies, to the anticipated direction of post-industrial cites and the role of infrastructure and appropriate urban development strategies, Smith covers a complex series of relevant topics, inviting the reader tEvents and Urban Regeneration - book covero understand how urban regeneration is delivered within major event contexts. Starting with a comprehensive theoretical platform of economic, political and social perspectives, Smith delves deeper in to the practical side of delivering such projects. He explores the catalytic properties of events for fuelling new urban projects, and their extraordinary nature to fast track existing priorities commenting on their power to influence wider city development and regeneration. Later on in Chapter 9, Smith provides a useful insight in to how such events are project managed. He analyses particular aspects of urban governance, exposing the often competing, conflicting nature of decisions made at a project management level, and the difficulties this poses for those delivering event regeneration. Balancing the needs of multiple stakeholder groups (e.g. local stakeholders, private and public organisations) in order to execute a ‘successful event’, and as of recent years delivering longer-term ‘legacy’ outputs, clearly appears to be a tough feat according to Smith’s analysis.

          A critical synthesis of key literatures, in-depth international case studies, visual aids and pockets of primary sources of data are used to justify arguments and provide recommendations for future urban policy and practice. One of the key strengths of the book is the match between detailed analysis of topics and the ‘global approach’ to major event analysis that allows Smith to provide a well-informed, qualitatively robust account of causalities between event policies and subsequent impacts for cities. Complete with a series of in-text, and end-of-chapter extended case studies, this is where the book comes in to its own. At the time of writing, there is no other book that has achieved such depth. Smith’s methodical approach to the writing and structuring of this book provides an exemplary learning experience. Concepts are clearly defined, applied to practice, balanced with some critical theory and illustrated within case study perspectives, providing the authority for judgements made. Throughout, Smith provides a series of well-balanced arguments presenting both favourable and critical opinions. There are however some specific noteworthy criticisms that emerge as core themes throughout his writing.

          With regards to such critical perspectives, it is the experiences of local community stakeholders in particular that resonate throughout the author’s work. Although not explicitly, Smith explores the notion of local casualties – often a product of a neo-liberal regime of privatisation and commercialisation etc, suggesting that urban city environments operate within a bourgeois playground for the elites, at the expense of community disadvantage. Obviously elites are not quite the declared beneficiaries of major events and subsequent economic development if we were to look at event-bid rhetoric, but as Smith explores, this is often the potential futures for a gentrified urban landscape. This is a common observation within major event settings, but is gentrification for good or bad? Who exactly receives a slice of the Olympic pie? Smith for example highlights the importance of estate price rises, for more property-led event funding to combat spiralling (often public) spending; however short-term impacts can often lead to the displacement of local communities and economically vulnerable groups (residential and business). These are the (many) types of contradictions that Smith explores (pages 256 – 259). Throughout the book, the author explores such controversies associated with hosting events, particularly ‘global vs local’ (and macro Vs micro) perspectives, ideologies that continue to spark commentator scepticism- even as we move in to an epoch supposedly characterised by ‘softer’ social and ‘people-focused’ regeneration (and longer-term legacy outcomes), rather than one characterised by the ‘harder’, economic (cost-benefit) based ambitions. Despite such rhetoric, contemporary authors continue to introduce the critical metaphor of Bakhtin’s ‘carnival mask’ to theoretically explore events as a sinister phenomenon of superficial regeneration (Harvey, 1989), that provides a ‘smokescreen’ (page 32) for inherent urban problems, rather than directly tackling them. As Smith and many authors critically postulate, such ‘softer’ outcomes desired by event organisers for particular communities, may just be a fig leaf to justify major expenditures, as cities realise the impossibility of economic returns on investment.

          Smith explores how the pressure of globalisation, and increasing severity of city competition for inward investment may be the focus for cities in the 21st century- a catalyst used to market and promote a city to attract e.g inward investment, a shift from ‘managerialism’ to ‘entrepreneurialism’ (Harvey, 1989) and a focus on the ‘entrepreneurial city’. Does this symbolise a shift towards a late / post-modernist paradigm? Smith argues again the contextual nature of this debate, exploring how South Africa, for example, are still seeking major events as a modernisation project to stimulate industrialisation, whereas Western societies and more developed (post-industrial) nations can be seen as entering a period of late / post-modernity. Smith however concludes that major events continue to be seen through a modern lens for progressive means, with postmodern tendencies in specific instances.

          Early on in Smith’s work (chapter 2), readers are treated with a much-needed theoretical platform to understand event regeneration at a deeper level, helping to explore why event projects are pursued, who they are meant to benefit and why they may / may not work, the complex processes that deliver them and explain why sceptics exist. Such theoretical, critical perspectives provide a much required injection to 1) a book that is very practice focussed, and 2) a field of inquiry systematically lacking in theoretical underpinning. Pages eighteen to forty in particular move away from the ‘nitty gritty’ of project complexity, to explore more sociological, cultural, political and economic dimensions of event delivery. Although a much needed theoretical dose, the author could have more closely bridged what appears to be a significant gap between theoretical explanations and practical considerations throughout. Instead, theoretical perspectives remained relatively divorced and fragmented from case studies and the analysis of practice, where I was left at times thinking e.g. “is Smith trying to reflect a view of neo-liberalism here?”… “Are these policies of state control, consolidating Smith’s critical ‘Ventilsitten ‘steam valve’ theory”? Even if Smith meant for such theoretical criticisms to be implicit in practice provided, I believe a more direct application would have provided a clearer heuristic.

          Smith’s work is genuinely a must have for those examining the relationship between events and urban regeneration and/or interested in the ecology of cities amidst a complex storm of ambitious political, commercial, economic and social event-related policies. Within known historical and contemporary urban arenas of contextual complexity, contradictions and competing stakeholder interests, the level of detail presented by the author throughout, provides an exceptional level of analysis – a must-read for students and practitioners alike.

Note: a huge thanks to both my supervisor Dr Ilaria Pappalepore, author Dr Andrew Smith of the University of Westminster and JPRiTLE for providing me with the opportunity to review such an interesting and thought provoking book.

Come back soon for the official published version from the journal.

What’s your writing style? Do you worship words from Anglo-Saxon, or do you favor French forms? An interesting history and disection of both styles…

Anglo SaxonMouth_Talk_SpeechBubble

When it comes to writing, are you the Anglo-Saxon type, or do you go for French flair? You probably realize that Modern English derives from a wide variety of sources, and perhaps are aware that words derived from French are just as common in our language as those that are descended directly from Old English, otherwise known as Anglo-Saxon.

But did you know that one of the features of English that make it such a rich language is a prevalence, unusual among the world’s languages, of synonyms, thanks to the fact that we have retained words from both Anglo-Saxon and French (and often other languages) that have the same meaning?

And have you considered that whether you choose a word derived from Anglo-Saxon or one borrowed from French or one of its Latinate relatives has a significant bearing on your writing voice?

Thanks to the Norman Conquest, for example, the Anglo-Saxon language became a second-class (or lower-class) tongue in England, supplanted in political and social contexts by Norman French, and therefore many cognates reflect the differences in relations to things between the two classes (who though their languages differed were closely related ethnically).

For example, Anglo-Saxon words for animals raised for food often reflect the role of Anglo-Saxons as keepers of livestock (cow, calf, sheep, pig), whereas the words obtained from French describe the food itself as it appeared on the table after cultivation and preparation by Anglo-Saxon farmers and servants (beef, veal, mutton, pork).

By the same token, many Anglo-Saxon words seem, by comparison with French, more plainspoken — more earthy (or earthly, rather than terrestrial, just as Anglo-Saxon heaven is more basic than the French-based equivalent, celestial). Other cognates that point out the differing perspectives are pairs like the humble home and the magnificent mansion, though often, for every master (French) there is a lord (Anglo-Saxon).

Of course, Anglo-Saxon acquired many words from Latin and its descendants before the Conquest, such as the introduction of many religious terms during the spread of Christianity and the expansion of the language due to trade with other European countries.

Likewise, the Germanic tribes that coalesced into the people of Anglo-Saxon England adopted many Latin and Greek terms before their arrival in Britain. And even after the largely Norman aristocracy abandoned their form of French in favor of Middle English, the latter language acquired many words from the influence of the Renaissance, and early Modern English was likewise enriched by the Enlightenment.

Notice, in your writing, whether you have an affinity with Anglo-Saxon or a French fetish, or whether you are bilingual: Do you give, or present? Do you describe someone as misleading, or deceptive? Do you refer to fatherly, motherly, or brotherly bonds or affection, or paternal, maternal, or fraternal feelings?

Though the number of English words derived from each language is about the same, the ones most essential for basic communication are of Anglo-Saxon origin, and many people correlate heavy use of Latin-derived words with verbosity and overblown language.

Thanks to M Nichol at DWT for writing this!
Original here: http://www.dailywritingtips.com/word-origin-influences-your-writing-voice/

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑